|
MDDL
Working Meeting Report
October
15, 2001, Fidelity, Boston, MA
Participating
Organizations
Bear Stearns, Deutsche Bank, Dow Jones, eSignal, Fidelity Investments,
FISD, Interactive Data Corporation, Liberty Funds, Morgan Stanley,
Nasdaq Stock Market, Reuters
MDDL 1.0 Draft Modifications
The draft version of MDDL has been
released and is posted on the MDDL web site. The following changes
have been made to the specification.
Glossary
- Default URI has been defined
- MDDL file format has been defined
- Controlled vocabulary files
have been cleaned and resolved with XSD
- Controlled vocabulary references
for "language," "currency" and "country"
have been converted to ISO standard
Resources
- MDDL presentation to IPTC has
been added
- The domain spreadsheet has
been updated and posted
- The controlled vocabulary spreadsheet
has been updated and posted
MDDL Version 1.0-Beta
- DTD is now valid in spy
- The term previousClose
has been added to the glossary
- The term value has been
renamed valuation
- The term delayed has
been added to the controlled vocabulary and the term delayFactor
has been added to exchangeConditions
- The term fraction has
been added as a holder for multiplier information
- The term period has
been reworked to mean duration (and duration can be a recurring
period)
Market Identification/Ticker
Symbol
- MDDL will use the updated ISO
Market Identification Code (MIC) to identify market.
- SWIFT is the registration authority
for MIC.
Instance Documents
One composite instance document
was created for validation and completeness review. The instance
document is posted on the MDDL web site. The working group would
like to see more examples that simulate real usage. The more specific
and varied the instance documents, the higher the level of confidence
that MDDL will work as intended for a wide range of users.
MDDL Glossary
Definitions on the MDDL glossary
MUST be completed prior to launch. In addition, the working group
does not believe the existing definitions have received sufficient
industry review. Members are specifically asked to evaluate the
glossary terms and definitions and to provide feedback to
James
Hartley or
Michael Atkin
at your earliest convenience.
The Working Group agreed to add
"non-product related" definitions to the glossary.
James Hartley is currently working
on stylesheets for the glossary and expects to have them posted
shortly.
Documentation
The following will be created prior
to MDDL launch on November 1:
- MDDL Implementation Overview
(managers guide) -- including the business case for the specification
- Full functional specification
showing details on how to use MDDL elements
- Online reference guide
- MDDL default schemes that will
need to be developed/implemented into the schema A visual expression
(diagram) outlining the scope of.
Update Methodology
MDDL will require a formal update
methodology after its release at the WFIC. The Working Group identified
two types of inquiries to be expected from the membership. The first
consists of general inquiries such as those related
to implementation of MDDL. The second includes change requests
where MDDL is found lacking. Change requests could include changes
to definitions, adjustments to fields, bugs in the specification
and proposed changes to the structure of MDDL.
MDDL version changes will be identified
according to the following:
1.0(x) = minor fixes to the specification
1.(x) = new target features and any change that impacts backwards
compatibility
FISD will implement a change request
mechanism on the web site consisting of a public bulletin board
and e-mail. The mechanism must capture (1) contact information (2)
proposed change/fix and (3) business justification for the adjustment.
A MDDL Review Committee has been established consisting of:
- Michael Atkin (FISD Staff)
- Mike Benveniste (Fidelity)
- Tony Coates (Reuters)
- James Hartley (Reuters)
- Rich Robinson (Deutsche Bank)
- Kevin Roche (MDDL Consultant)
Definition of Market Data
There have been a few discussions
related to the definition of market data within MDDL. The Working
Group reinforced the decisions of the MDDL Steering Committee --
MDDL is an XML-based
interchange format and common data dictionary on the fields needed
to describe 1) financial instruments, 2) corporate events affecting
value and tradability and 3) market-related, economic and industrial
indicators.
During the discussion the scope
of MDDL was characterized as … "any data used to analyze,
account or trade within a market." Another way of looking
at the objective is to recognize that the goal of MDDL is data element
transparency. As such, MDDL must be able to uniquely identify all
data elements distributed by vendor and information provider feeds.
The only open question is to determine
the priority of the data products and constructs to be addressed
within MDDL.
What's Next?
The Working Group has asked FISD
to survey members and other interested parties on product and construct
prioritization. During the discussion, the options were organized
as follows:
- Completion of Asset Classes (Instruments)
-- any of which could be:
- Organized by depth (i.e.
completion of all equities and collective investment vehicles)
- Organized by scope (i.e.
the most important product areas such as fixed income or derivatives
from an applications perspective)
- Organized by global impact
(i.e. the most important global products to ensure that MDDL
is recognized as a global standard)
- Security Master File and Corporate
Action data -- which was identified as one of the most important
areas for straight through processing. Descriptive/reference data
is essential for automation and an area where MDDL could bring
immediate value to the industry.
- Standard Request/Response Mechanism
-- which was identified as one of the original constructs, but
tabled until after MDDL Version 1.0.
|